Lawrence v. Texas (2003)
Case background and primary source documents concerning the Supreme Court case of Lawrence v. Texas. Dealing with a citizen’s constitutional right to privacy in regards to sex, this lesson asks students to analyze how the Court’s definition of privacy evolved from 1965 to 2003.
Freedom of Speech
The freedom to express one's opinions without interference from the the government is critical to the maintenance of liberty within a free society.
Inalienable / Natural Rights
Freedoms which belong to us by nature and can only be justly taken away through due process.
Except where authorized by citizens through the Constitution, the government does not have the authority to limit freedom.
Citizens are best able to pursue happiness when government is confined to those powers which protect their life, liberty, and property.
Throughout history, society has passed laws restricting sexual activity. Laws regarding incest, adultery, and prostitution exist in all 50 states today. Historically, state laws dealing with sexual activity included prohibitions on sodomy. These laws were based in English common law. The growing acceptance of homosexual lifestyles in America led to challenges of sodomy laws. Most states forbade gay sex until the 1960s.
Griswold v. Connecticut (1965), Eisenstadt v. Baird (1972), and Roe v. Wade (1973) were cases which sought to define a right to privacy with regard to reproductive choices. Reproductive decisions involve sexual activity between consenting adults, and the Court ruled in 1965 that the Bill of Rights protected a zone of privacy in America’s bedrooms. The challenge, therefore, became how to define the limits of Americans’ rights to privacy with regard to sex.
In 1986, the Supreme Court refused to recognize a “fundamental right of homosexuals to engage in sodomy” in the case of Bowers v. Hardwick. The Court declined to extend the protections afforded under Griswold and Eisenstadt, and upheld the power of the states to limit sexual activity. The Court was asked to revisit its decision seventeen years later. In Lawrence v. Texas, John Lawrence challenged a Texas state law banning certain sexual acts between people of the same sex. He claimed the law violated privacy and due process rights protected by the Constitution.
Analyze how the Court’s definition of privacy evolved from 1965 to 2003.
Read the Case Background and Key Question. Then analyze Documents A-M. Finally, answer the Key Question in a well-organized essay that incorporates your interpretations of Documents A-M, as well as your own knowledge of history.
Documents you will examine:
- Commentaries on the Laws of England, Book IV, 1765-1769
- Federalist No. 51, 1788
- Concurring Opinion, Railway Express Agency v. New York, 1949
- Majority Opinion, Griswold v. Connecticut, 1965
- Majority Opinion, Eisenstadt v. Baird, 1972
- Majority Opinion, Roe v. Wade, 1973
- Gallup Poll: “Americans’ Views on Homosexuality and the Law,” 1977-2003
- Majority Opinion, Bowers v. Hardwick, 1986
- Majority Opinion (6-3), Lawrence v. Texas, 2003
- Concurring Opinion, Lawrence v. Texas, 2003
- Dissenting Opinion (Antonin Scalia), Lawrence v. Texas, 2003
- Dissenting Opinion (Clarence Thomas), Lawrence v. Texas, 2003
- “What Are You Doing Here?” 2003
- Personal Liberty – Essay by Dennis Goldford, Ph.D.
- Lawrence v. Texas – Case Background
- Documents to Examine (A-M)
- The Issue Endures
- Identifying and Teaching against Misconceptions: Six Common Mistakes about the Supreme Court – Essay by Diana E. Hess
- Classroom Applications
- Online Resources
- Case Briefing Sheet
- Constitutional Issue Evidence Form
- Documents Summary
- Attorney Document Analysis
- Moot Court Procedures
- Tips for Thesis Statements and Essays
- Rubric for Evaluating a DBQ Essay on a 9-Point Scale
- Key Question Scoring Guidelines for All Essays
- Constitutional Principles and their Definitions
- Answer Key